Instellingen

Wij maken gebruik van cookies. Lees meer hierover in ons privacybeleid. We respecteren privacy, daarom geven we controle over de manier waarop we met gegevens omgaan.

Altijd actief
 

 

 

 
Spring naar content
Terug naar de kennisbank

The (over)use of SMART goals for physical activity promotion

a narrative review and critique

This review suggests that the SMART acronym: is not based on scientific theory; is not consistent with empirical evidence; does not consider what type of goal is set; is not applied consistently; is lacking detailed guidance; has redundancy in its criteria; is not being used as originally intended; and has a risk of potentially harmful effects. These issues are likely leading to sub-optimal outcomes, confusion, and inconsistency. Recommendations are provided to guide the field towards better practice and, ultimately, more effective goal setting interventions to help individuals become physically active.

Literatuurverwijzing: Swann, C., Jackman, P.C., & Lawrence, A. (2022). The (over)use of SMART goals for physical activity promotion: a narrative review and critique. Health psychology review

Omschrijving

  • Jaar:
    2022
  • Uitgever(s):
    Taylor Francis
  • Mediumsoort:
    Artikel in wetenschappelijk tijdschrift
  • Tijdschrift:
    Health psychology review
  • Trefwoord(en):