Spring naar content
Terug naar de kennisbank

The (over)use of SMART goals for physical activity promotion (2022)

a narrative review and critique

This review suggests that the SMART acronym: is not based on scientific theory; is not consistent with empirical evidence; does not consider what type of goal is set; is not applied consistently; is lacking detailed guidance; has redundancy in its criteria; is not being used as originally intended; and has a risk of potentially harmful effects. These issues are likely leading to sub-optimal outcomes, confusion, and inconsistency. Recommendations are provided to guide the field towards better practice and, ultimately, more effective goal setting interventions to help individuals become physically active.

Literatuurverwijzing: Swann, C., Jackman, P.C., & Lawrence, A. (2022). The (over)use of SMART goals for physical activity promotion: a narrative review and critique. Health psychology review

Omschrijving

  • Jaar:
    2022
  • Uitgever(s):
    Taylor Francis
  • Mediumsoort:
    Artikel in wetenschappelijk tijdschrift
  • Tijdschrift:
    Health psychology review
  • Trefwoord(en):